Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI meeting assistants / Avoma
Avoma
AI meeting assistant with conversation and revenue intelligence add-ons, published seat pricing, and CRM sync aimed at mid-market revenue teams.
B2B sales and customer teams that want automatic notes plus optional conversation and revenue intelligence without a Gong-class platform fee.
Individuals who only want a free personal recorder with minimal team analytics.
Co-founded by Aditya Kothadiya.
Verdict
Avoma is a good fit when meeting notes and coaching keep living in separate tools and you want one mid-market stack. Public packaging is unusually clear for conversation intelligence. Practitioners like CRM push and scorecards; buyers who only need a free personal notepad may still prefer Fathom, and clip-first enablement teams may still prefer Grain.
Score Breakdown
How Avoma scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Avoma publishes Startup, Organization, and Enterprise recorder seats on avoma.com/pricing, with optional Conversation Intelligence, Revenue Intelligence, and Lead Router add-ons. Figures below are USD list signals as of September 2026 when billed annually; viewers stay free.
| Plan / SKU | Meter | Price (USD) | What stands out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Startup | per recorder / month | From ~$19 | Notes, transcription, 1:1 scheduler |
| Organization | per recorder / month | From ~$29 | Custom topics, group scheduling |
| Enterprise | per recorder / month | From ~$39 | SSO, HIPAA path, success extras |
| CI / RI add-ons | per seat / month | From ~$29 each | Coaching scorecards and deal intelligence |
The Field at a Glance
How Avoma compares with other AI meeting assistants vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Avoma scores 7.9 in AI meeting assistants, under Fireflies.ai (8.0), and ahead of tl;dv (7.7) and Fathom (7.6). Relative cost lands mid-band for this subcategory.
Compared with …
- Avoma vs Fathom 7.9/7.6
- Avoma vs Grain 7.9/6.8
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AI meeting notes + CRM | Strong | Core Avoma motion. |
| Conversation intelligence coaching | Strong | Conversation intelligence is a paid add-on. |
| Revenue / deal intelligence | Strong | Avoma sells revenue intelligence as an add-on, not a separate platform. |
| Free personal recorder at scale | Mixed | Fathom leads with a free personal recorder. |
| Clip-first enablement libraries | Mixed | Grain builds clip and coaching libraries. |
| GPU cloud clusters | Poor | Avoma does not rent GPU clusters. |
Review Excerpts
Excerpts from company materials and public coverage of Avoma, plus representative buyer views drawn from public information. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.
“I can tell you that our top sales people couldn't live without Avoma.”
“Notes, scorecards and CRM updates come out of the same recording, so reps spend less time on admin.”
Representative buyer view
“We use meeting templates for discovery and renewal calls and sync summaries to HubSpot.”
Representative buyer view
“The add-on structure means total cost depends on which intelligence modules a team switches on.”
Representative buyer view
Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.
Based on: Avoma’s website
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2017 (CB Insights)
- Headquarters
- Palo Alto, California, United States (CB Insights)
- Total funding raised
- $12M (CB Insights)
- Key investors
- K9 Ventures, Twin Ventures, Storm Ventures, Industry Ventures, Operator Partners (CB Insights)
- Website
- avoma.com
Key Leadership
Aditya Kothadiya
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Avoma for buyers comparing options in AI meeting assistants. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Avoma did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for AI meeting assistants)
- Meeting notes & CRM sync
- Conversation / coaching add-ons
- Published pricing clarity
- Free-tier personal recorder breadth
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.
Scope
Avoma is graded here as AI meeting assistants. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.