Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI email assistants / Shortwave

Shortwave

AI-first Gmail client for individuals and teams, with summaries, search, filters, and drafting features aimed at clearing a high-volume inbox.

6.9/10
Overall Score
Conditional recommend

Shortwave suits people who live in Gmail and want AI summaries, search and drafting. Seat prices climb from $30 to $120, and it has less shared-inbox depth than Missive.

Best for

Individuals and small teams living in Gmail who want AI summaries, search, and drafting inside a dedicated client.

Not ideal for

Support or ops teams that mainly need a shared company inbox with assignees and internal comments across many mailboxes.

Co-founded by Andrew Lee.

Verdict

Shortwave is a fair fit when Gmail itself feels slow and you want AI triage without rebuilding your team on a shared-inbox ops tool. Published Business through Max seats are clear but climb quickly. Practitioners like summaries and bundles; teams that need shared assignments and comments across a company mailbox may still prefer Missive.

Score Breakdown

How Shortwave scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.

Buyer outcomes

AI inbox triage & search
7.2
Gmail client productivity
7.1
Team collaboration depth
6.7
Seat price value at scale
6.6

Company & commercial

Innovation & product leadership
7.0
Project management & communication
6.8
Pricing
6.8
Contract fairness
6.8

Pricing

Shortwave publishes Business, Premier, and Max seat plans on shortwave.com/pricing. Figures below are USD list signals as of September 2026; confirm annual vs monthly billing and AI usage quotas before budgeting.

Plan / SKUMeterPrice (USD)What stands out
Businessper seat / month$30Standard intelligence; AI filters and search
Premierper seat / month$45Advanced intelligence; 2x AI usage
Maxper seat / month$120Expert intelligence; 6x AI usage
Trialdays14Free trial path on site

The Field at a Glance

How Shortwave compares with other AI email assistants vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.

6 7 8 9 Overall Score $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Relative typical engagement cost Superhuman Missive Fyxer Shortwave 6.9
Shortwave Superhuman Missive Fyxer

Shortwave scores 6.9 in AI email assistants, under Superhuman (8.2), Missive (7.9), and Fyxer (7.8). Relative cost lands mid-band for this subcategory.

Compared with …

Use-case matrix

Use caseFitNotes
AI Gmail triage and searchStrongCore Shortwave motion.
AI drafting and summariesStrongProduct emphasis.
Published individual seat pricingStrongClear tier cards.
Shared team inbox opsMixedMissive is built for shared inboxes with assignments and comments.
Outlook-first enterprisesWeakShortwave works with Gmail, not Outlook.
AI code reviewPoorShortwave does not review code.

Review Excerpts

Representative buyer views drawn from public information about Shortwave. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.

What people like

“After switching to Shortwave, I got to Zero Inbox in record time! Plus, the AI-based Summarize feature is a real time-saver for long threads.”

Will Moxley, SVP of Product · AppFolio · source
What people like

“I no longer dread looking through my email, since Shortwave has everything I need to get through it FAST.”

Jordan Tranchina, Product Manager · Gusto · source
How it's used

“AI search across years of mail and thread summaries replaced a lot of manual inbox triage.”

Founder at a small company
Representative buyer view
What people don't like

“Teams on Outlook or Microsoft 365 cannot use it, and shared-inbox workflows are lighter than in tools built for them.”

Operations manager at a mid-size company
Representative buyer view

Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.

Based on: Shortwave’s website

Key Leadership

Andrew Lee

Andrew Lee

Co-founder and CEO

Methodology

This page is an independent evaluation of Shortwave for buyers comparing options in AI email assistants. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Shortwave did not pay for this review.

What we scored

The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.

  • Buyer outcomes (for AI email assistants)
    • AI inbox triage & search
    • Gmail client productivity
    • Team collaboration depth
    • Seat price value at scale
  • Company & commercial
    • Innovation & product leadership
    • Project management & communication
    • Pricing
    • Contract fairness

Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.

Score Composition

InputWeightWhat it covers
Reviews40%A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope.
Product35%Hands-on look at screens and workflows.
Pricing15%Whether the price looks fair for what you get.
Docs & training10%Docs, tutorials, and training material.

How we balanced the evidence

The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.

Scope

Shortwave is graded here as AI email assistants. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.

← Back to AI email assistants