Home / Directory / Trust, legal & compliance / AI compliance automation / Secureframe

Secureframe

Compliance automation platform that helps security and GRC teams collect evidence, map controls, and prepare for frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO without a purely manual spreadsheet process. Secureframe raised a $56 million Series B in 2022 and added a CMMC product, Secureframe Defense, in 2026.

7.7/10
Overall Score
Recommend

Secureframe collects audit evidence from a company's cloud, identity and engineering tools and maps it to frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA. It sells through sales-assisted quotes, so buyers cannot price it from the website.

Best for

Security and GRC teams that want automated evidence collection and continuous compliance workflows for common frameworks.

Not ideal for

Teams that only need a one-time consultant audit binder, or buyers comparing only the largest household GRC suites.

Verdict

Secureframe is a good fit when the bottleneck is gathering evidence across SaaS systems for recurring audits. Practitioners like the automation path; buyers who want a different regional or pricing posture may still compare Sprinto.

Score Breakdown

How Secureframe scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.

Buyer outcomes

Evidence collection automation
8.1
Framework mapping (SOC 2 / ISO)
8.0
Continuous monitoring workflows
7.8
Lightweight one-off audit binder
6.6

Company & commercial

Innovation & product leadership
7.7
Project management & communication
7.5
Pricing
7.9
Contract fairness
7.6

Pricing

Secureframe prices through sales-assisted plans. Model below reflects common mid-market packaging themes for 2026; confirm frameworks, integrations, and seat math on a live quote.

Sales-assisted compliance automation packaging by frameworks and company size. Expect annual contracts; ask which integrations and continuous-monitoring modules are included.

The Field at a Glance

How Secureframe compares with other AI compliance automation vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.

6 7 8 9 Overall Score $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Relative typical engagement cost Scrut Sprinto Scytale Secureframe 7.7
Secureframe Scrut Sprinto Scytale

Secureframe scores 7.7 in AI compliance automation, ahead of Scrut (7.6), Sprinto (7.4), and Scytale (7.3). Relative cost lands upper-mid on sales-assisted plans.

Use-case matrix

Use caseFitNotes
Evidence automationStrongConnects to cloud, identity and engineering tools and pulls evidence from them.
Framework mappingStrongMaps one set of controls to SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS and other frameworks.
Continuous monitoringStrongTests controls on a schedule and flags failures between audits.
One-off audit binder onlyMixedSecureframe is built for a continuing program, so a single document set is more than that buyer needs.
Regional pricing alternativesMixedSprinto, Scrut and Scytale sell comparable platforms, so compare quotes before choosing.
ATS recruitingPoorSecureframe does not cover ATS recruiting.

Review Excerpts

Representative buyer views drawn from public information about Secureframe. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.

What people like

“Evidence from our cloud and identity tools lands in one place, so audit preparation no longer starts with a spreadsheet.”

Security lead at a SaaS company
Representative buyer view
How it's used

“We run SOC 2 and ISO 27001 from the same control set and send the auditor one evidence trail.”

Head of compliance at a software company
Representative buyer view
What people don't like

“Pricing comes after a sales call and rises with each framework, so budgeting takes a quote cycle.”

Operations manager at a startup
Representative buyer view

Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.

Based on: Secureframe’s website

Company Facts

Founded
2020 (CB Insights)
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States (CB Insights)
Total funding raised
$78.71M (CB Insights)
Key investors
Gaingels, Gradient Ventures, Soma Capital, Kleiner Perkins, Kaiser Permanente Ventures (CB Insights)
Website
secureframe.com

Key Leadership

Shrav Mehta

Shrav Mehta

Founder and CEO

Methodology

This page is an independent evaluation of Secureframe for buyers comparing options in AI compliance automation. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Secureframe did not pay for this review.

What we scored

The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.

  • Buyer outcomes (for AI compliance automation)
    • Evidence collection automation
    • Framework mapping (SOC 2 / ISO)
    • Continuous monitoring workflows
    • Lightweight one-off audit binder
  • Company & commercial
    • Innovation & product leadership
    • Project management & communication
    • Pricing
    • Contract fairness

Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.

Score Composition

InputWeightWhat it covers
Reviews40%A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope.
Product35%Hands-on look at screens and workflows.
Pricing15%Whether the price looks fair for what you get.
Docs & training10%Docs, tutorials, and training material.

How we balanced the evidence

The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.

Scope

Secureframe is graded here as AI compliance automation. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.

← Back to AI compliance automation