Home / Directory / Talent, learning & services markets / AI interviewing & candidate screening / Ribbon
Ribbon
AI recruiter from Toronto that runs voice and video interviews with every applicant, scores them, and handles SMS and email outreach. Dayforce agreed in October 2026 to acquire Ribbon. The price and closing date were not disclosed.
Multi-location employers and staffing teams hiring warehouse, retail, storage, and other hourly roles at volume.
Teams that want to hire straight from the AI score without listening to interviews, or buyers who need SOC 2 Type II today.
Verdict
Ribbon is an AI interviewing company in Toronto, Canada, started by a machine learning lead and a head of people who met at the health tech company Ezra. Employers use it to send every applicant an interview link by SMS or email, run a two-way voice or video interview in more than 10 languages, and get back a score, a transcript, and flags for cheating. It earns attention because hourly applicants often apply at night and drop off if nobody calls back, and Ribbon interviews them right away at a price small teams can see before talking to sales.
Score Breakdown
How Ribbon scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Ribbon publishes three plans billed annually, each with a monthly interview allowance and a per-interview overage rate.
| Plan | Price | What stands out |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | $499 / month | 2 seats, 2 active roles, 100 interviews a month, then $4.00 per interview |
| Business | $999 / month | 5 seats, 5 active roles, 400 interviews a month, then $3.00 per interview |
| Scale | $1,999 / month | 10 seats, 10 active roles, 1,000 interviews a month, then $2.50 per interview |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited interviews, custom voices, SSO, SOC 2 and security reviews, dedicated CSM |
The Field at a Glance
How Ribbon compares with other AI interviewing & candidate screening vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Ribbon scores 7.4 in AI interviewing & candidate screening, under Alex (7.5) and Sapia.ai (7.5), and level with HeyMilo (7.4). Relative cost lands mid-band for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Hourly and frontline roles | Strong | Built around warehouse, retail, and multi-site hiring. |
| After-hours applicants | Strong | Candidates interview whenever they apply. |
| Contractor and evaluator screening | Strong | Cartesia ran 43 interviews in four weeks. |
| Technical and senior roles | Mixed | Possible, but scoring needs closer human review. |
| Hiring straight from the score | Weak | Scores can miss strong candidates; listen to the interview. |
| Strict security procurement | Mixed | SOC 2 Type I, with Type II in observation. |
Review Excerpts
Excerpts from company materials and public coverage of Ribbon, plus representative buyer views drawn from public information. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.
“The biggest value for us is scale. I would not have been able to conduct 43 mini interviews in a live setting over the past month.”
“Ribbon is saving us an immense amount of time in the initial screening process. It allows me to screen 10x the amount of candidates that we usually would have capacity for.”
“With the Dayforce acquisition pending, we would ask how pricing and the standalone product will change before signing.”
Representative buyer view
Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.
Based on: BetaKit’s report on the Dayforce deal
Key Leadership
Arsham Ghahramani
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Ribbon for buyers comparing options in AI interviewing & candidate screening. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Ribbon did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for AI interviewing & candidate screening)
- Voice interview quality
- Hourly & frontline hiring fit
- ATS integrations
- Scores you can trust without review
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.
Scope
Ribbon is graded here as AI interviewing & candidate screening. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.