Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI RFP & proposal generation / Proposify
Proposify
Proposal software for sales teams to build, track, and close branded proposals with content libraries, analytics, and published Team through Business packaging aimed at mid-market revenue groups.
Sales and services teams that want proposal templates, content reuse, and tracking with clearer published plans than a fully opaque enterprise RFP quote.
Enterprise response teams that need AutogenAI-class AI bid drafting or Responsive-class questionnaire program controls across security RFPs.
Verdict
Proposify is a fair fit when the job is shipping polished sales proposals with reuse and tracking rather than running a full RFP response factory. Practitioners like template speed; heavy RFP and security-questionnaire teams may still prefer Responsive-class library workflows or AutogenAI for AI-first drafting.
Score Breakdown
How Proposify scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Proposify lists Build, Grow and Scale plans on proposify.com/pricing. Figures are USD list prices read from the vendor’s pricing page in November 2026.
| Plan / SKU | Meter | Price (USD) | What stands out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build | per user / month | $39 billed yearly ($49 monthly) | Unlimited documents and signatures, content library, AI and MCP server |
| Grow | per user / month | $65 | Extra users billed at $780 a year |
| Scale | per user / month | $107 ($12,800 a year platform fee, 10 users included) | Extra users $780 a year |
| Free trial | days | 14 | No card needed |
The Field at a Glance
How Proposify compares with other AI RFP & proposal generation vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Proposify scores 7.4 in AI RFP & proposal generation, under Conveyor (7.9), AutogenAI (7.7), and Arphie (7.5), and ahead of Responsive (7.1) and QorusDocs (6.6). Relative cost lands lower for this subcategory.
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Sales proposal creation | Strong | Core Proposify motion. |
| Template & content reuse | Strong | Common buyer story. |
| Proposal tracking analytics | Strong | Published Business path. |
| AI-first bid / RFP drafting | Mixed | AutogenAI is built around generative drafting of bids and RFP responses. |
| Enterprise questionnaire programs | Mixed | Responsive runs questionnaire programs for large teams. |
| Calendar focus-time scheduling | Poor | Proposify does not cover calendar focus-time scheduling. |
Review Excerpts
Representative buyer views drawn from public information about Proposify. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.
“Reps send a branded proposal from a template and see when the buyer opens it.”
Representative buyer view
“Agencies keep pricing tables and terms in a content library and e-sign in the same document.”
Representative buyer view
“Sends are capped per plan with overage fees, which matters for high-volume teams.”
Representative buyer view
Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.
Based on: Proposify’s pricing page
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2012 (CB Insights)
- Headquarters
- Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (CB Insights)
- Total funding raised
- $10.95M (CB Insights)
- Key investors
- Innovacorp, Canadian Business Growth Fund, Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Patrick Hankinson (CB Insights)
- Website
- proposify.com
Key Leadership
Kyle Racki
Co-founder and CEO
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Proposify for buyers comparing options in ai rfp & proposal generation. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Proposify did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for ai rfp & proposal generation)
- Branded sales proposal building
- Content reuse & tracking
- Published plan clarity
- Enterprise RFx / questionnaire depth
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.
Scope
Proposify is graded here as ai rfp & proposal generation. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.