Home / Directory / AI SaaS tooling / AI presentation copilots / Pitch
Pitch
Collaborative presentation workspace with AI credits, templates, pitch rooms, and engagement analytics aimed at teams that build and share decks together. Adam Renklint became CEO in January 2024.
Small teams that want a collaborative presentation workspace with sharing links, guests, and light AI credits, and do not need a PowerPoint add-on.
Buyers who need the strongest AI auto-layout or in-PowerPoint generation as the primary job, or enterprises that must stay on locked PPT masters only.
Verdict
Pitch is a fair fit when the pain is team collaboration on decks and shareable pitch experiences, not only one-shot AI generation. Published Plus and Team euro seats are clear, though AI credit allotments are modest. Practitioners like collaboration polish; buyers centered on Smart Slide auto-design may still prefer Beautiful.ai, and PPT-locked teams may still prefer Plus AI.
Score Breakdown
How Pitch scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.
Pricing
Pitch publishes Free, Plus, Team, and Business plans on pitch.com/pricing. Figures below are EUR list prices as of November 2026 when billed yearly.
| Plan / SKU | Meter | Price (EUR) | What stands out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plus | per month (yearly) | About €15 | 500 AI credits; PPT export |
| Team | per month (yearly) | About €20 | Collab; pitch rooms; guests |
| Business | per month (yearly) | Higher seat band | More AI credits; unlimited links |
| Enterprise | annual | Custom quote | SSO, SCIM, success manager |
The Field at a Glance
How Pitch compares with other AI presentation copilots vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.
Pitch scores 6.9 in AI presentation copilots, under Beautiful.ai (8.0), SlidesAI (7.7), and Plus AI (7.5). Relative cost lands mid-band for this subcategory.
Compared with …
- Pitch vs Beautiful.ai 8.0/6.9
- Pitch vs Plus AI 7.5/6.9
Use-case matrix
| Use case | Fit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Collaborative presentation workspace | Strong | Core Pitch motion. |
| Pitch rooms and engagement links | Strong | Stated product emphasis. |
| Published team seat pricing | Strong | Plans are priced in euros. |
| Best-in-class AI auto-layout | Mixed | Beautiful.ai builds around AI auto-layout. |
| Native PPT/Google Slides add-on | Mixed | Plus AI works inside PowerPoint and Google Slides. |
| Cold-email infrastructure | Poor | Pitch does not provide cold-email infrastructure. |
Review Excerpts
Representative buyer views drawn from public information about Pitch. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.
“I love Pitch and have used it for fund raises, board meetings, and internal company presentations.”
“Shared templates and live collaboration keep a sales team’s decks consistent.”
Representative buyer view
“We send decks through pitch rooms and check which slides prospects open.”
Representative buyer view
“Teams that live in PowerPoint will find the move to a separate editor harder than an add-in.”
Representative buyer view
Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.
Based on: Pitch’s website
Company Facts
- Founded
- 2018 (CB Insights)
- Headquarters
- Berlin, Germany (CB Insights)
- Total funding raised
- $137.88M (CB Insights)
- Key investors
- Index Ventures, Thrive Capital, Tiger Global Management, Lakestar, Impact Venture Capital (CB Insights)
- CEO
- Adam Renklint, since January 2024 (TechCrunch)
- Website
- pitch.com
Methodology
This page is an independent evaluation of Pitch for buyers comparing options in AI presentation copilots. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Pitch did not pay for this review.
What we scored
The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria sit under it in two groups.
- Buyer outcomes (for AI presentation copilots)
- Collaborative deck workspace
- Pitch rooms & sharing analytics
- AI generation depth
- PPT/Google Slides add-on path
- Company & commercial
- Innovation & product leadership
- Project management & communication
- Pricing
- Contract fairness
Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.
Score Composition
| Input | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 40% | A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope. |
| Product | 35% | Hands-on look at screens and workflows. |
| Pricing | 15% | Whether the price looks fair for what you get. |
| Docs & training | 10% | Docs, tutorials, and training material. |
How we balanced the evidence
The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.
Scope
Pitch is graded here as AI presentation copilots. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.