Home / Directory / AI infrastructure / Power, cooling & facility ops / Green Revolution Cooling

Green Revolution Cooling

Single-phase immersion cooling systems (ICEraQ and related) for dense AI and HPC racks, aimed at facilities that have outgrown air cooling.

6.4/10
Overall Score
Conditional recommend

GRC is a credible immersion option for dense CPU and GPU halls that need rack density air cooling cannot reach. Pricing is capital and project-quoted, and public review volume is thinner than for SaaS peers.

Best for

HPC and AI facility teams designing immersion for high-density racks where air cooling and power envelopes no longer work.

Not ideal for

Operators that can still meet density with air or rear-door heat exchangers, or buyers wanting a monthly SaaS cooling SKU.

Verdict

Green Revolution Cooling is a good fit for operators that need single-phase immersion for dense AI and HPC racks. Pricing is capital and project-based with quote-led deployments, not a public SaaS table. Facility teams cite density and pPUE gains in case studies such as TACC Lonestar6; it is a conditional immersion peer to Submer when air cooling will not cut it.

Score Breakdown

How Green Revolution Cooling scores in the categories that matter to its buyers.

Buyer outcomes

Immersion cooling hardware
6.7
Dense rack / node density
6.6
Facility retrofit fit
6.3
Public evidence breadth
6.1

Company & commercial

Innovation & product leadership
6.5
Project management & communication
6.4
Pricing
6.2
Contract fairness
6.5

The Field at a Glance

Where Green Revolution Cooling ranks among Power, cooling & facility ops vendors we reviewed, by Overall Score and relative typical engagement cost.

6 7 8 9 Overall Score $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Relative typical engagement cost Submer Utilidata Green Revolution Cooling 6.4
Green Revolution Cooling Submer Utilidata

GRC scores 6.4, behind Submer (6.7) and Utilidata (7.8). Utilidata covers a different power-visibility job. GRC’s relative typical engagement cost is in the capital project band with other facility cooling buys.

Use-case matrix

Use caseFitNotes
Immersion for dense AI/HPC racksStrongICEraQ systems fit this job.
Raising nodes per rack vs airStrongCase studies show large density gains.
Rack power telemetry onlyPoorUtilidata covers that job.
Light air-cooled colo hallsWeakImmersion is more than these halls need.

Review Excerpts

Excerpts from company materials and public coverage of Green Revolution Cooling, plus representative buyer views drawn from public information. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites were excluded.

What people like

“Immersion cooling enabled TACC to run 280W CPUs that run too hot for air cooling, supporting a major performance step on Lonestar6.”

TACC / GRC case study coverage · InsideHPC · source
How it's used

“Lonestar6 immersion deployments raised rack density dramatically versus prior air-cooled layouts while targeting very low cooling overhead (pPUE near 1.02 in published material).”

GRC TACC Lonestar6 case materials · source
What people like

“Immersion let us cool dense nodes without enlarging the air-handling plant.”

Data center engineer at an HPC center
Representative buyer view
What people don't like

“There is no public price list. Immersion is a custom facilities project, which makes side-by-side vendor comparison slow.”

Facilities engineer at a hosting company
Representative buyer view

Where customer reviews couldn't be found, our analysts attempted to give a voice to buyer sentiment, drawing on real information from review sites, forums, and product documentation.

Based on: insideHPC’s coverage of the TACC Lonestar6 immersion deployment

Company Facts

Founded
2009 (CB Insights)
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, United States (CB Insights)
Total funding raised
$36.29M (CB Insights)
Key investors
Samsung Ventures, SK Lubricants, National Science Foundation, Canonical Crypto (CB Insights)
Website
grcooling.com

Methodology

This page is an independent evaluation of Green Revolution Cooling for buyers comparing options in power, cooling & facility ops. AI Industry Reviews accepts no sponsorships, advertising, or pay-for-placement fees. Green Revolution Cooling did not pay for this review.

What we scored

The headline number is an Overall Score on a 0-10 scale. Eight criteria fall under it in two groups.

  • Buyer outcomes (for power, cooling & facility ops)
    • Immersion cooling hardware
    • Dense rack / node density
    • Facility retrofit fit
    • Public evidence breadth
  • Company & commercial
    • Innovation & product leadership
    • Project management & communication
    • Pricing
    • Contract fairness

Pricing measures whether the price looks fair for the value delivered, including packaging and renewal friction that show up in real buying cycles.

Score Composition

InputWeightWhat it covers
Reviews40%A proprietary read of what practitioners say about likes, complaints, and day-to-day use, including public review sites, forums, and private chat rooms. Paid reviews and pay-for-play sites are out of scope.
Product35%Hands-on look at screens and workflows.
Pricing15%Whether the price looks fair for what you get.
Docs & training10%Docs, tutorials, and training material.

How we balanced the evidence

The Overall Score is the simple average of the eight criteria. Recommendation language follows that score and the use-case matrix above.

Scope

Green Revolution Cooling is graded here as power, cooling & facility ops. Criteria scores can move as more review volume and product checks are added.

← Back to Power, cooling & facility ops